Whether the sexual intercourse involved violence or intimidation, whether the other party gave explicit or implied consent, and whether the complainant’s statements are consistent with the objective evidence.
01. Background
01 Following a comprehensive review of the case, MegaX Law Office found no objective circumstances indicating that violence or intimidation had occurred before, during, or after the sexual intercourse. MegaX organized the facts of the case, focusing on various circumstances demonstrating the other party’s voluntary and active participation during the encounter.
02 Furthermore, a comprehensive examination of the complainant’s statements, conduct, and surrounding circumstances following the incident revealed responses that differed from the behavioral patterns generally associated with victims immediately after a forcible sexual encounter. The complainant’s statements also changed over time, and certain details were found to be inconsistent with the surrounding circumstances. Based on these findings, MegaX prepared a legal analysis challenging the credibility of the complainant’s statements and submitted it to the investigative authorities.
03 Through these efforts, MegaX sought to ensure that the investigative authorities assessed the case comprehensively, taking into account all circumstances before, during, and after the incident rather than relying solely on isolated statements.
- PreviousWhether the Allegations Under the Act on the Protection of Children and Youth Against Sex Offenses (Quasi-Sexual Acts and Indecent Assault) Are Inconsistent with the Actual Circumstances and Statements 26.09.16
- Next[Case Closed Without Formal Charges] Successful Case: Client Implicated as a Money Transfer Agent in a Voice Phishing Scheme Cleared During the Preliminary Investigation Without Being Formally Booked 26.09.16