Legal Q&A

Ask MEGA X

Q
Criminal

I took an online "package forwarding" job in Korea and one of the parcels I reshipped contained drugs — I'm on a working holiday. Am I a smuggler now?

MEGA X 2026-10-14 3
I'm British, working holiday visa, six months in Korea. Three months ago I answered an ad for a "logistics assistant" job: receive parcels at my address, repackage them, and forward them to addresses in Japan and Australia, paid per parcel. I did maybe fifteen. Yesterday police arrived: one of the parcels I forwarded to Australia was intercepted there and contained methamphetamine. They say I'm being investigated for "export of narcotics" and possibly as part of an "organization." I gave a long statement — I told them everything, the ad, the chats, the payments — and was released with a summons.
I'm sick about it. I never opened the parcels; that was the rule. I thought it was grey-market electronics.
What I need to know: (1) Is forwarding a sealed parcel I didn't open "export of narcotics" under Korean law? (2) "Part of an organization" — how does the law decide whether I was a mule or a member? (3) What can I do now that I've already told them everything?

A Answer

Forwarding a sealed parcel is export of whatever it contained, in the physical sense; whether it is the crime of exporting narcotics depends on what you knew or accepted might be inside — and "reshipping jobs" of the kind you describe are a known recruitment pattern for exactly the person the organizers want: someone who will not open the box. Korean law distinguishes a knowing courier from a deceived one, and the line is drawn on the evidence of what you were told, what you were paid, and what a reasonable person in your position would have suspected. "Part of an organization" is the prosecutor's framing for the network; whether you are charged as a member or treated as a recruited tool is decided on the same evidence. You have already given the police everything, which is the right thing and is now done; what you do next is make sure the file contains the full version of "everything."
What this is under Korean law
Exporting methamphetamine is an offense under Article 58 of the Narcotics Control Act (마약류관리법, mayangnyu gwalli-beop) — the most serious tier, with a range starting at five years' imprisonment and running to life — and, at trafficking quantities, within the aggravated provisions. Where an organized group is involved, Article 114 of the Criminal Act (criminal organization) may be added. That is the statute the police cited.
Intent is required. It includes willful blindness (미필적 고의, milpiljeok goui) — recognizing the possibility that the parcels contained drugs and accepting it — and that is the entire case. Korean courts have distinguished between couriers who negotiated a fee for a task they understood, and recruited "reshippers" who believed a plausible cover story, were paid modestly, and acted openly under their own names. The second group has been acquitted, or not charged, or convicted of a lesser degree of complicity, when the evidence supported their belief. The first group has been sentenced as traffickers.
Mule or member
The facts that decide it: the recruitment — an ad for a "logistics" job, versus a contact who spoke of "product"; the instructions — "do not open" is common to both and is not decisive; the pay — per-parcel amounts consistent with a courier job versus sums that only drug transport would justify; your conduct — your real name and address on customs forms, your own account for payments, no attempt to conceal; and any moment where suspicion should have crystallized — a parcel's weight, a warning from customs, a message from the "employer" that only made sense for contraband. Fifteen parcels is a fact that cuts both ways: it shows regularity, and it shows a person who believed the job was real enough to keep doing it openly.
You have already told them everything
Your long statement is the foundation now, and it should be reviewed by counsel line by line. The task is not to change it but to complete it: every message with the "employer," every payment, the ad, the addresses, the tracking numbers, the parcels' descriptions as given to you — assembled into a file that shows a person deceived, and that helps the police reach the organizers. Cooperation of that kind is the single strongest factor in a courier case, at the prosecutor's desk and at sentencing; it is also the argument against detention if a warrant is sought. A second interview is likely; prepare it with your lawyer so that it confirms the first.
Your situation as a foreign national
Assume a departure suspension (출국정지, chulguk jeongji) is in place. You are entitled to an interpreter and counsel. A detention warrant is a real risk in an export case and must be prepared for: fixed address, passport surrendered, counsel on record, complete cooperation. Consular notification applies if you are detained.
A conviction for export, at any level, is a deportation matter and a long entry ban; a case that ends without charge, or with a lesser complicity finding and a suspended sentence, is a very different immigration picture. The Immigration Office decides; we do not predict. MEGA X handles the criminal case; where it affects your status, we coordinate with an immigration specialist as part of your defense.
What to do now, and what not to do
Retain counsel before the second interview. Do not contact the "employer" account or respond to it; preserve it. Do not accept or forward anything further. Provide counsel with every record. Contact your consulate. Tell your family; they can appoint counsel if you are detained.
From a former police investigator's perspective
Intercepted-parcel cases come back to Korea with a shipper's name, and investigators know the reshipping-job pattern well — they have seen the ads. What they are deciding about the shipper is whether he was recruited or was a partner, and they decide it on the chats and the money. A reshipper who hands over the whole recruitment thread, the pay records and the addresses, and whose own name is on every form, has handed the investigator the organization's trail; that is a person the investigator writes up as a victim of recruitment and a cooperating witness. A reshipper who says "I was just the delivery guy" and stops there has described a courier.
Contact us before the second interview — text consultation or +82-2-522-3959.
— Hyeonghwan Chon, Managing Partner, MEGA X Law Firm Korea

Need personalized legal help? This answer is general information. Book a consultation to discuss your specific case with a MEGA X attorney. Request a consultation
Text Consultation